default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCIDCOMMA 2024: Hagen, Germany
- Chris Reed, Matthias Thimm, Tjitze Rienstra:
Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2024, Hagen, Germany, September 18-20, 2024. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 388, IOS Press 2024, ISBN 978-1-64368-534-2 - Leila Amgoud
:
Semantics in Argumentation: Classifications and Challenges. 3 - Ulrike Hahn:
Expanding the Scope of Bayesian Argumentation. 4-7 - Serena Villata:
The Long Road to Trustworthy Natural Language Argumentation. 8-9 - Davide Ceolin, Laura Sofie Ootes:
Review Argumentation at Scale. 13-24 - Paul Cibier, Jean-Guy Mailly:
Graph Convolutional Networks and Graph Attention Networks for Approximating Arguments Acceptability. 25-36 - Jonathan Clayton, Marco Damonte, Robert J. Gaizauskas:
Parsing Graphical Summaries from Argumentative Dialogues. 37-48 - Marcello D'Agostino, Sanjay Modgil:
Extending Dialectical Classical Logic Argumentation with Unrestricted Rebut and Occam Razor Defeats. 49-60 - Zvonimir Delas, Brian Plüss, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz:
An Argumentation Scheme-Based Framework for Automatic Reconstruction of Natural Language Enthymemes. 61-72 - Adrian de Wynter, Tangming Yuan:
"I'd Like to Have an Argument, Please": Argumentative Reasoning in Large Language Models. 73-84 - Yannis Dimopoulos, Wolfgang Dvorák, Matthias König:
Connecting Abstract Argumentation and Boolean Networks. 85-96 - Anthony Hunter:
Dialogical Argumentation for Behaviour Change with Multiple Persuasion Goals. 97-108 - Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Johannes Peter Wallner:
Complexity of Semi-Stable Semantics in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. 109-120 - Tuomo Lehtonen, Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni, Markus Ulbricht, Johannes Peter Wallner:
On Computing Admissibility in ABA. 121-132 - Beishui Liao, Leendert van der Torre:
Attack-Defense Semantics of Argumentation. 133-144 - Michael A. Müller, Davide Grossi:
Measuring the Impact of Arguments on Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation. 145-156 - Michael A. Müller, Blaz Istenic Urh, Teodor-Stefan Zotescu, Ulle Endriss:
Breaking the Cycle. Preference-Based Aggregation for Cyclic Argumentation Frameworks. 157-168 - Jack Mumford, Stefan Sarkadi, Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
Applying Argument Schemes for Simulating Online Review Platforms. 169-180 - Daphne Odekerken:
Finding Relevant Updates in Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks. 181-192 - John Lawrence:
Protocol Switching in a Multi-Agent Dialogue System. 193-204 - Nico Potyka, Richard Booth:
An Empirical Study of Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks for Truth Discovery. 205-216 - Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni:
On the Robustness of Argumentative Explanations. 217-228 - Premtim Sahitaj, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz, Ariana Sahitaj, Ata Nizamoglu, Vera Schmitt, Salar Mohtaj, Sebastian Möller:
From Construction to Application: Advancing Argument Mining with the Large-Scale KIALOPRIME Dataset. 229-240 - Chiaki Sakama:
Argument and Belief. 241-252 - Eimear Maguire, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz, Melvin Abraham, John Lawrence, Jacky Visser:
Annotating and Mining Hypotheses in Argumentation. 253-264 - Roos Scheffers, Floris Bex, AnneMarie Borg:
Related Explanations in Formal Argumentation, an Empirical Study. 265-276 - Clara Seyfried, Chris Reed, Yuki Kamide:
Defining Argumentative Discourse Units as Clauses: Psycholinguistic Evidence. 277-288 - Guilherme Trajano, Débora C. Engelmann, Rafael H. Bordini, Stefan Sarkadi, Jack Mumford, Alison R. Panisson:
Translating Natural Language Arguments to Computational Arguments Using LLMs. 289-300 - Kees van Berkel, Sanjay Modgil:
A Nonmonotonic Proof Theory for Dialectical Argumentation Under Bounded Resources. 301-312 - Kees van Berkel, Christian Straßer, Zheng Zhou:
Towards an Argumentative Unification of Default Reasoning. 313-324 - Johannes Peter Wallner, Adam Z. Wyner, Tomasz Zurek:
Value-Based Reasoning in ASPIC+. 325-336 - Andreas Xydis, Ionut Moraru, Elizabeth Sklar:
Strategising in Dialogues Handling Forward Extension of Enthymemes. 337-348 - Ewelina Gajewska, Katarzyna Budzynska, Barbara Konat:
Analytics for Rhetorical Arguments in Discussions on Polarised Issues. 351-352 - Alexander Greßler, Wolfgang Dvorák, Stefan Woltran:
The GSAF Solver and Verifier. 353-354 - Xiaolong Liu, Weiwei Chen:
On the Proportional Acceptability of Arguments in Abstract Argumentation. 355-356 - Michele Persiani:
PyPLAF: Probabilistic Logical Argumentation Frameworks in Python. 357-358 - Jordan Robinson, Katie Atkinson, Simon Maskell, Chris Reed:
Identifying Diagnostic Arguments in Abstract Argumentation. 359-360 - José Ruiz Alarcón, Timotheus Kampik:
QBAF-Py: Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation in C with Python Bindings. 361-362 - Florian Ruosch, John Lawrence, Cristina Sarasua, Abraham Bernstein:
A Unified Benchmark for Argument Mining. 363-364 - Florian Ruosch, Cristina Sarasua, Chris Reed, Abraham Bernstein:
Toward the Argument Web of Science. 365-366 - Florian Ruosch, Joel Watter, Cristina Sarasua, Abraham Bernstein:
Documents with Integrated Visually Annotated Arguments. 367-368 - Jeff Thompson, Kristinn R. Thórisson:
ABA Argument Graphs with Constraints. 369-370 - Maciej Uberna, Katarzyna Budzynska, Marcin Koszowy, Patrick Saint-Dizier:
Analytics for Linguistically Characterising Rephrased Arguments. 371-372 - Yilin Xia, Daphne Odekerken, Shawn Bowers, Bertram Ludäscher:
Layered Visualization of Argumentation Frameworks. 373-374
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2025-12-04 22:05 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
