default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCIDLearned Publishing, Volume 29
Volume 29, Number 1, January 2016
- Michael Willis
:
Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses. 5-7 - Bo-Christer Björk, Paul Catani:
Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference? 9-12 - Michael Jubb:
Peer review: The current landscape and future trends. 13-21 - Stephen R. Thompson, Julie Agel, Elena Losina:
The JBJS Peer-Review Scoring Scale: A valid, reliable instrument for measuring the quality of peer review reports. 23-25 - James Hartley, John Cowan, Nick Rushby:
Peer choice - does reviewer self-selection work? 27-29 - David Nicholas, Jie Xu, Lifang Xu, Jing Su, Anthony Watkinson:
Chinese researchers, scholarly communication behaviour and trust. 31-38
- Verity Warne:
Rewarding reviewers - sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained. 41-50 - Fiona Murphy:
An update on peer review and research data. 51-53
- Ruwaida M. Salem, Natalie M. Culbertson, Alison O'Connell:
Process for selecting and implementing a manuscript management system: Experiences of a new peer-reviewed journal. 55-59 - Brooks Hanson, Rebecca Lawrence, Alice Meadows, Laura Paglione:
Early adopters of ORCID functionality enabling recognition of peer review: Two brief case studies. 60-63
- Alison Baverstock:
Is peer review still the content industry's upper house? 65-68 - Rebecca Kennison:
Back to the future: (re)turning from peer review to peer engagement. 69-71
Volume 29, Number 2, April 2016
- Judy Luther:
Discovery in an age of artificial intelligence. 75-76
- Mohammad Reza Ghane:
How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals? 77-82 - Heather Morrison:
Small scholar-led scholarly journals: Can they survive and thrive in an open access future? 83-88 - Candela Ollé Castellà, Alexandre López Borrull, Ernest Abadal:
The challenges facing library and information science journals: Editors' opinions. 89-94 - Albert N. Greco, Robert Michael Wharton, Amy Brand:
Demographics of scholarly publishing and communication professionals. 97-101 - Ali Gazni, Zahra Ghaseminik:
Internationalization of scientific publishing over time: Analysing publishers and fields differences. 103-111
- Katie Foxall, Audrey Nailor:
Sustainability in open access publishing: The ecancer case study. 113-117 - Jonathan Griffin:
Access to Research: An innovative and successful initiative by the UK publishing industry. 119-123
- Paul Kudlow, Alan Rutledge, Aviv Shachak, Roger S. McIntyre, Gunther Eysenbach:
TrendMD: Helping scholarly content providers reach larger and more targeted audiences. 125-129
- Bo-Christer Björk:
The open access movement at a crossroad: Are the big publishers and academic social media taking over? 131-134 - Lauren Kane, Alice Meadows:
From the podium to the boardroom: Encouraging gender parity in scholarly publishing. 135-138
Volume 29, Number 3, July 2016
- Pippa Smart:
Are publishers failing as a service industry? 143-144
- Songqing Lin, Lijuan Zhan:
International publishing partnerships for China's English language journals and financial security. 145-153 - Eleonora Dagiene, Danute Krapavickaite:
How researchers manage their academic activities. 155-163 - Abdullah Abrizah, David Nicholas, Abdullah Noorhidawati, Yanti Idaya Aspura Mohd Khalid, Fathiah Badawi:
Not so different after all: Malaysian researchers' cross-discipline view of quality and trustworthiness in citation practices. 165-172 - David Nicholas, David J. Clark, Eti Herman:
ResearchGate: Reputation uncovered. 173-182 - Louisa Ha, Weiwei Jiang, Chang Bi, Ruonan Zhang, Tao Zhang, Xiaoli Wen:
How online usage of subscription-based journalism and mass communication research journal articles predicts citations. 183-192 - Geum-Hee Jeong, Sun Huh:
Analysis of the suitability of the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies journal evaluation tool. 193-198
- Alex D. Wade, Kuansan Wang:
The rise of the machines: Artificial intelligence meets scholarly content. 201-205
- Vicky Williams:
Broader outreach: Fad or future? 207-209 - Sneha Kulkarni:
What causes peer review scams and how can they be prevented? 211-213 - Rick Anderson:
Why are there virtually no mandatory open access policies at American universities? 215-218 - Anne-Katharina Weilenmann:
Scientific communication - on the brink of the next evolution? 219-221
Volume 29, Number 4, October 2016
- Judy Luther:
Changing of the guard. 227-228
- Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza, Ricardo Arencibia Jorge:
A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation. 229-238 - Melba G. Claudio-González, Montserrat Martín-Baranera, Anna Villarroya:
A cluster analysis of the business models of Spanish journals. 239-248 - Maryam Zeinolabedini, Javad Gholami:
Colleagues helping each other to publish in medical sciences: Iranian field specialists' convenience editing strategies. 249-258 - Mikael Laakso, David J. Solomon, Bo-Christer Björk:
How subscription-based scholarly journals can convert to open access: A review of approaches. 259-269 - Caitlin Gebhard, Bruce Rosenblum:
Wrangling math from Microsoft Word into JATS XML workflows. 271-279
- David Thew:
Mentoring as a career development tool: A universal resource or only for the 'anointed'? 283-290
- Edith Holmes:
Economies of small: How a single-journal publisher remains independent and grows. 293-299 - Alexandre Martin, Tristan Martin:
A not-so-harmless experiment in predatory open access publishing. 301-305
- Julian M. Bass:
Improving writing processes using lean and Kanban. 307-310
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2025-12-04 01:28 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
