"Is ACM-W Still Relevant After 30 Years? Exploring the Ongoing Needs of ..."

Shelly Engelman et al. (2025)

> Home

Details and statistics

DOI: 10.1145/3641555.3705209

access: closed

type: Conference or Workshop Paper

metadata version: 2025-05-07

- view
  - electronic edition via DOI
  - unpaywalled version
  authority control:
- export record
  dblp key:
  - conf/sigcse/EngelmanHWONR25
- ask others
- share record
  persistent URL:
  - https://dblp.org/rec/conf/sigcse/EngelmanHWONR25
Shelly Engelman, Rachelle Kristof Hippler, Andrew B. Watkins, Patricia Opong, Natalie Nurse, David M. Reed:
Is ACM-W Still Relevant After 30 Years? Exploring the Ongoing Needs of Women and URMs in Computing. SIGCSE (2) 2025: 1451-1452

manage site settings

To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.