![](https://dblp.dagstuhl.de/img/logo.ua.320x120.png)
![](https://dblp.dagstuhl.de/img/dropdown.dark.16x16.png)
![](https://dblp.dagstuhl.de/img/peace.dark.16x16.png)
Остановите войну!
for scientists:
![search dblp search dblp](https://dblp.dagstuhl.de/img/search.dark.16x16.png)
![search dblp](https://dblp.dagstuhl.de/img/search.dark.16x16.png)
default search action
20. JURIX 2007: Leiden, The Netherlands
- Arno R. Lodder, Laurens Mommers:
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Leiden, The Netherlands, 12-15 December 2007. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 165, IOS Press 2007, ISBN 978-1-58603-810-6 - Janneke H. Gerards:
Judicial review in fundamental rights cases - how to provide guidance to judges? JURIX 2007: 3-4 - David A. Larson:
Technology Mediated Dispute Resolution. JURIX 2007: 5 - Tommaso Agnoloni, Lorenzo Bacci, Enrico Francesconi, Pier-Luigi Spinosa, Daniela Tiscornia, Simonetta Montemagni, Giulia Venturi:
Building an ontological support for multilingual legislative drafting. 9-18 - Alexander Boer, Radboud Winkels, Fabio Vitali:
Proposed XML Standards for Law: MetaLex and LKIF. 19-28 - Danièle Bourcier, Pierre Mazzega:
Codification, Law Article and Graphs. 29-38 - Jenny Eriksson Lundström, Jørgen Fischer Nilsson, Andreas Hamfelt:
Legal rules and argumentation in a metalogic framework. 39-48 - Mark Giereth, Steffen Koch, Yiannis Kompatsiaris, Symeon Papadopoulos, Emanuele Pianta, Luciano Serafini, Leo Wanner:
A Modular Framework for Ontology-based Representation of Patent Information. 49-58 - Carole D. Hafner, Marc Lauritsen:
Extending the power of automated legal drafting technology. 59-68 - Sefora Junqueira, Evandro Costa:
Computer Intelligent Support for the ADR/ODR Domain. 69-78 - Emile de Maat, Radboud Winkels:
Categorisation of Norms. 79-88 - Raquel Mochales Palau, Marie-Francine Moens:
Study on Sentence Relations in the Automatic Detection of Argumentation in Legal Cases. 89-98 - Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Henry Prakken, Bram Roth:
Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes. 99-108 - Maaike Schweers, Bart Verheij:
Beyond boxes and arrows: argumentation support in terms of the knowledge structure of a legal topic. 109-118 - Anne L. Washington, Jeffrey C. Griffith:
Legislative Information Websites: Designing Beyond Transparency. 119-128 - Gwen R. Wildeboer, Michel C. A. Klein, Elisabeth M. Uijttenbroek:
Explaining the Relevance of Court Decisions to Laymen. 129-138 - Adam Zachary Wyner, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning. 139-149 - Adam Zachary Wyner, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson:
Arguments, Values and Baseballs: Representation of Popov v. Hayashi. 151-160 - Witold Abramowicz, Piotr Stolarski, Tadeusz Tomaszewski:
Reasoning Using Polish Commercial Companies Code Ontology. 163-164 - Ignacio Alamillo, Daniel Martinez, Philip Seltsikas, Nikolaos Papas:
Designing a Modelling Methodology for Legal Workflows. 165-166 - Geert De Meyer, Greet Van Eetvelde:
The development of a Content Management System for Environmental Legislation based on Version Management. 167-168 - Guido Governatori, Joris Hulstijn, Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo:
On the Representation of Deadlines in a Rental Agreement. 169-170 - M. Saravanan, Balaraman Ravindran, S. Raman:
Using Legal Ontology for Query Enhancement in Generating a Document Summary. 171-172
![](https://dblp.dagstuhl.de/img/cog.dark.24x24.png)
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.